Seepage analysis forms an important and basic part of geotechnical engineering owing to its importance in ground water contamination control, slope stability analysis and dam design. Furthermore, It is important for determining the distribution of seepage uplift pressures and the resulting seepage forces as well as the estimation of the volume of seepage losses through the body and the foundation of earth dams. Casagrande (1940) and Schaffernak (1916) improved on Dupuit’s solution of seepage through earth dam without considering tail water. In this work, modification of Schaffernak’s model was done to accommodate tail water. Values obtained using the new model though similar to that of the three other models (Dupuit, Casagrande and Schaffernak) shows that existence of tail water affects the value of seepage. The new model is very consistent from 3-6 m height. Though the seepage equation from the new model is similar to that of Casagrande, they differ because the value of seepage face for the tail water ‘a’, used for computations are not the same. For each of the model, there is a linear relationship between the seepage and the height of water upsream. Interestingly, there is a sharp change in seepage at 6m height of dam with increase in slope between 6 m and 9 m for each model except at the slope of 1:2.5 where a decrease in slope was recorded for the new model.
Published in | Mathematical Modelling and Applications (Volume 3, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.mma.20180304.11 |
Page(s) | 44-50 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Seepage, Calculus, Earth Dam, Scaffernak’s Solution, New Seepage Equation
[1] | Arinze, E. E and Agunwamba, J. C. (2010) Comparative analysis of seepage through dam using different analytical and numerical methods. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 6(1-2):78-87. |
[2] | Mishra, G. C. and Singh, A. K. (2005) Seepage through a Levee. International Journal of Geomechanics 5(1):31-40. |
[3] | Zhang, L. M., Xu, J. and Jra, J. S. (2009) Analysis of earth dam failure: A database approach Journal of Georisk 3(3):184-189. |
[4] | Taypur, G., Swiatek, D., Wifa, A. and Singh, V. P. (2005) Case study: finite element method and artificial neural network models for flow through Jeziorsko earthfill Dam in Poland. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 731(6):1-8. |
[5] | Thieu, N. T. M., Fredlund, M. D., Fredlund, D. G and Hung, V. Q. (2001) Seepage modeling in a saturated/unsaturated soil system. International Conference on Management of the Land and Water resources. |
[6] | Giglou, A. N. and Zerratparvar, A. (2012) Seepage estimation through earth dam. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific research, 2012;1(1):1-5. |
[7] | Gui, S., Zhang, R., Turner, J. P and Xue, X. (2000). Probabilistic slope stability analysis with stochastic hydraulic conductivity. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 126(1):41-47. |
[8] | Srivastava, A., Badu, G. L. S. and Haldar, S. (2010) Influence of spatial variability of permeability property on steady state seepage flow and slope stability analysis. Dams 11(3-4):93-101. |
[9] | Budhu, M. (2011) Soil mechanics and Foundation, John Wiley & sons, New Jersey. |
[10] | Kokaneli, S. P., Maghsoodian, S. Molaabasi, H. and Kordnaeij, A. (2013) Seepage evaluation of earth dam using Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) type neural network: A case study. Scientific Research and Essay 8(3):120-127. |
[11] | Li, G., Ge, J. and Jie, Y. (2003) Free surface seepage analysis based on element free method. Mechanics Research Communications 30(1):9-19. |
[12] | Jie, Y., Liu, L., Xu, W, and Li, G. (2013) Application of NEM in Seepage analysis with a free surface. Mathematics and computers in simulation 89(1):23-27. |
[13] | Panthulu, T. V., Krishnaiah, C. and Shirke, J. M. (2001) Detection of seepage paths in earth dams using self potential and electrical resistivity methods. Engineering Geology 59(3-4):281-295. |
[14] | Kazemzadeh-Parsi, M. J. and Daneshmand, S. (2011) Unconfined seepage analysis in earth dams using smoothed fixed grid finite element method. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 36(1):449-461. |
[15] | Chen, Q and Zhang, L. M. (2006) Three dimensional analysis of water infiltration into Gouhou rockfill dam using saturated seepage theory. Canadian Geotechnical. Journal 43(5): 449-461. |
[16] | Kermani, E. F. and Barani, G. A. (2012) Seepage Analysis through Earth Dam on Finite Difference Method. Journal of basic and Applied Scientific Research 4(3) 23-61. |
[17] | Dupuits, J. (1863) Theoriques et pratiques sur le movement des Eaux dan les Canaux decouverts et a travers les terrains permeables (2nd Ed): Fans: Dunod. |
[18] | Schaffernak, F. (1916) Theory of bed transportation and its application 68(12):209-214. |
[19] | Casagrande, A. (1937) Seepage through Dams. Journal of New England Water Works Association 51(2):295-336. |
[20] | Gilboy, G. (1933). Hydraulic fill dams. Proc. Intern. Comm. Large Dams, Stockholm. |
[21] | Ike, C. C. (2006) Principles of Soil Mechanics. De-Adroit Innovation, Enugu. |
[22] | Arshad, I. and Babar, M. M. (2014) Comparison of SEEP/W simulation with field observations for seepage analysis through an earthen Dam. International Journal of Research 1(7):57-70. |
[23] | McFarland, J. E. (1958) An iterative solution of the quadratic equation in Banach space. Retrieved from www.ams.org. |
[24] | Department of Primary Industries and Water, DPIW, (2006) Guidelines for the construction of earth-fill dam Water Resources Division: State of Tasmania, 2008. |
[25] | Harr, M. E. (2011) Groundwater and seepage, McGracw Hill Book. Counter Corporation, New York. |
[26] | Qiu, J., Zheng, D. and Zhu, K. (2016) “Seepage monitoring models study of earth-rock dams influenced by rainstorms,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2016, Article ID 1656738, 11 pages. |
[27] | Lee, J., Kim, J and Kang. G (2018) Seepage Behaviour of earthdam considerting rainfall effects. Advances in Civil Engineering. 2018 Volume, Article ID 8727126, 9 pages. |
APA Style
Arinze Emmanuel Emeka, Agunwamba Jonah Chukwuemeka. (2019). Modified Schaffernak’s Solution for Seepage Through Earth Dam. Mathematical Modelling and Applications, 3(4), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.mma.20180304.11
ACS Style
Arinze Emmanuel Emeka; Agunwamba Jonah Chukwuemeka. Modified Schaffernak’s Solution for Seepage Through Earth Dam. Math. Model. Appl. 2019, 3(4), 44-50. doi: 10.11648/j.mma.20180304.11
@article{10.11648/j.mma.20180304.11, author = {Arinze Emmanuel Emeka and Agunwamba Jonah Chukwuemeka}, title = {Modified Schaffernak’s Solution for Seepage Through Earth Dam}, journal = {Mathematical Modelling and Applications}, volume = {3}, number = {4}, pages = {44-50}, doi = {10.11648/j.mma.20180304.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.mma.20180304.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.mma.20180304.11}, abstract = {Seepage analysis forms an important and basic part of geotechnical engineering owing to its importance in ground water contamination control, slope stability analysis and dam design. Furthermore, It is important for determining the distribution of seepage uplift pressures and the resulting seepage forces as well as the estimation of the volume of seepage losses through the body and the foundation of earth dams. Casagrande (1940) and Schaffernak (1916) improved on Dupuit’s solution of seepage through earth dam without considering tail water. In this work, modification of Schaffernak’s model was done to accommodate tail water. Values obtained using the new model though similar to that of the three other models (Dupuit, Casagrande and Schaffernak) shows that existence of tail water affects the value of seepage. The new model is very consistent from 3-6 m height. Though the seepage equation from the new model is similar to that of Casagrande, they differ because the value of seepage face for the tail water ‘a’, used for computations are not the same. For each of the model, there is a linear relationship between the seepage and the height of water upsream. Interestingly, there is a sharp change in seepage at 6m height of dam with increase in slope between 6 m and 9 m for each model except at the slope of 1:2.5 where a decrease in slope was recorded for the new model.}, year = {2019} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Modified Schaffernak’s Solution for Seepage Through Earth Dam AU - Arinze Emmanuel Emeka AU - Agunwamba Jonah Chukwuemeka Y1 - 2019/01/03 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.mma.20180304.11 DO - 10.11648/j.mma.20180304.11 T2 - Mathematical Modelling and Applications JF - Mathematical Modelling and Applications JO - Mathematical Modelling and Applications SP - 44 EP - 50 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1794 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.mma.20180304.11 AB - Seepage analysis forms an important and basic part of geotechnical engineering owing to its importance in ground water contamination control, slope stability analysis and dam design. Furthermore, It is important for determining the distribution of seepage uplift pressures and the resulting seepage forces as well as the estimation of the volume of seepage losses through the body and the foundation of earth dams. Casagrande (1940) and Schaffernak (1916) improved on Dupuit’s solution of seepage through earth dam without considering tail water. In this work, modification of Schaffernak’s model was done to accommodate tail water. Values obtained using the new model though similar to that of the three other models (Dupuit, Casagrande and Schaffernak) shows that existence of tail water affects the value of seepage. The new model is very consistent from 3-6 m height. Though the seepage equation from the new model is similar to that of Casagrande, they differ because the value of seepage face for the tail water ‘a’, used for computations are not the same. For each of the model, there is a linear relationship between the seepage and the height of water upsream. Interestingly, there is a sharp change in seepage at 6m height of dam with increase in slope between 6 m and 9 m for each model except at the slope of 1:2.5 where a decrease in slope was recorded for the new model. VL - 3 IS - 4 ER -